Conflict Over Alamo's Historical Narrative Leads to CEO Resignation

Thu Dec 11 2025 07:40:34 GMT+0200 (Eastern European Standard Time)

The resignation of Alamo Trust's CEO Kate Rogers follows criticism from Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick regarding her views on historical narratives at the Texas shrine.

Kate Rogers, the CEO of the Alamo Trust, has resigned amid a political controversy sparked by her critical views on traditional narratives surrounding the Alamo’s history. Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick publicly criticized Rogers after she questioned the conservative educational policies enacted by the Texas Legislature. This incident highlights the ongoing struggle within the U.S. over how historical events are represented, particularly those involving slavery and Indigenous peoples, with Patrick emphasizing a need to preserve a narrative he terms '13 Days of Glory.'

The conflict surrounding the Alamo, referred to as 'the Shrine of Texas Liberty,' has brought the resignation of its CEO, Kate Rogers, into focus. Her departure follows a public reprimand from Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, who called for her resignation due to her critical views expressed in a recent academic paper. Rogers's paper scrutinized the Texas Legislature's conservative educational policies, arguing for a more inclusive historical narrative that acknowledges the presence and contributions of Indigenous peoples and the complex background of slavery in Texas's fight for independence.

Patrick's campaign against Rogers highlights the deep-rooted political tensions over how Texas history is portrayed, particularly concerning the Alamo's role in shaping state identity. As the Alamo Trust, responsible for managing the historic site, grapples with these issues, the future of how history is taught in Texas remains a contentious topic.

Rogers’s resignation marks a significant turning point in the ongoing struggle for historical representation, raising questions about academic freedom in the face of political pressure. Her desire to promote a more unified narrative that includes multiple perspectives contrasts sharply with an administration that prioritizes a traditional interpretation of events content to bolster a specific political agenda.