Court Upholds Jurisdiction in Alki David's Case Against Media Legal Cartel

Mon Feb 02 2026 13:59:15 GMT+0200 (Eastern European Standard Time)

The Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court ruled on a jurisdiction issue in a key legal battle involving businessman Alki David against foreign corporate interests. Justice Rene Williams emphasized the complexity of multijurisdictional claims amid allegations of misconduct.

On January 16, 2026, the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court, led by Justice Rene Williams, heard crucial arguments regarding jurisdiction in the ongoing case of Alki David versus the Media Legal Cartel. Despite concerns raised about the court's jurisdiction due to the presence of defendants in foreign jurisdictions, Justice Williams noted the potential impact of actions that occurred within Antigua & Barbuda. The AG's counsel expressed doubt about the local court's jurisdiction, referencing a lack of a clear connection to Antiguan law. Mr. David countered these arguments, asserting that the harm was felt within Antigua and that the court remains the appropriate jurisdiction. The matter is expected to be formally addressed in a written ruling in early February 2026.

Court Upholds Jurisdiction in Alki David's Case Against Media Legal Cartel

January 16, 2026 | Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court 9.00 AM AGT
Justice Rene Williams presiding

Justice Williams seized the case by valid issuance, acceptance of jurisdiction, and active case management under ECSC CPR, and retained seizure by declining to stay or dismiss the proceedings despite parallel foreign actions.

During the hearing, the Court sought clarification regarding recent written submissions from all sides on the issue of jurisdiction, including the Attorney General’s Office of Antigua & Barbuda.

Justice Williams noted that she had recently received Mr. David’s submissions and had reviewed them briefly. Counsel for the Attorney General confirmed they were aware of Mr. David's filings but had not yet reviewed them in detail.

Mr. David clarified that his filing did not introduce new evidence but included service receipts on defendants, a note addressing comity with parallel proceedings in California and London, and re-filed documents.

The Court then reviewed the Attorney General’s position, which argued that the Court lacked jurisdiction based on several factors, including the residency of most defendants outside Antigua and the claims not being clearly governed by Antiguan law.

Justice Williams noted that the physical presence in Antigua seemed limited, except for possibly one or two individuals linked to property ownership.

Mr. David’s Response

In response, Mr. David stressed that physical presence does not determine jurisdiction. He asserted that the damages incurred due to alleged conduct occurred within Antigua & Barbuda and involved the Alpha Nero yacht, a central element of the alleged conspiracy.

Foreign corporations broadcast into Antigua

Sovereign programs connected to Antigua were deliberately targeted

Parallel proceedings abroad illustrated misconduct, not a lack of jurisdiction

Justice Williams acknowledged Mr. David's points but raised concerns over the effects of the alleged harm primarily being felt outside Antigua. She mentioned the risk of inconsistent rulings with other jurisdictions, yet Mr. David maintained that Antigua was the anchor jurisdiction.

Howard Kennedy Letter Raised by the Court

Justice Williams revealed a letter from Howard Kennedy LLP, asserting they deny the jurisdiction of the Antiguan court. Justice Williams confirmed the letter would be shared with both parties.

Mr. David maintained that Howard Kennedy's non-participation constituted contempt.

Conclusion

Justice Williams thanked both sides for their contributions and stated that she would carefully consider all materials. A written ruling is expected early next month.