MINNEAPOLIS — A federal judge is poised to hear arguments on whether to temporarily halt a federal immigration crackdown in Minnesota, which has been linked to the fatal shootings of two individuals by law enforcement officers.
The state of Minnesota, alongside the cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul, has filed a lawsuit against the Department of Homeland Security, seeking to restore pre-December conditions following the launch of Operation Metro Surge by the Trump administration.
The urgency of the legal action has intensified following the shooting of Renee Good by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer and the recent fatal incident involving Border Patrol officer Alex Pretti.
In their initial request, city and state officials seek a reduction in the number of federal officers and agents in Minnesota while maintaining the enforcement of immigration laws within certain limits. Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison is expected to personally attend the hearing.
Justice Department attorneys have labeled the lawsuit as legally frivolous, arguing that Minnesota is attempting to usurp the powers of federal law enforcement. They are requesting that any interim order be stayed pending an appeal.
Ellison has stated that the suit addresses a novel abuse of the Constitution, pointing to the unprecedented nature of the immigration enforcement surge as justification for the legal challenge. The situation not only affects Minnesota but could have ramifications for other states facing similar federal immigration initiatives.
A group of attorneys general from 19 states and the District of Columbia, led by California, have filed a friend-of-the-court brief supporting Minnesota's lawsuit, stressing that unchecked federal power could lead to further unlawful actions in both Minnesota and elsewhere.
As the court prepares to hear the case, Ellison and local leaders are advocating for a careful consideration of the implications of federal immigration policies on community safety and the constitutional rights of residents.
