SACRAMENTO, Calif. — California filed a lawsuit against the federal government on Friday, contesting the approval of a Texas-based company’s intention to restart two oil pipelines along the state’s coast. This legal action marks a significant escalation in California's ongoing struggle against the Trump administration's efforts to remove obstacles to offshore oil drilling, which have not been seen for decades.
The project by Houston-based Sable Offshore Corp., which seeks to restart production in Santa Barbara waters affected by a 2015 oil spill, has been touted by the federal government as a critical step in increasing U.S. energy production. However, California officials, including Attorney General Rob Bonta, argue that the federal administration overstepped its bounds, infringing upon the state's regulatory authority.
“You can’t sidestep California’s environmental protections,” Bonta stated during a news conference announcing the lawsuit. “We’re drawing a line in the sand to protect our coast, our beaches, and our communities from the potential hazards posed by these pipelines.”
In contrast, a spokesman for the U.S. Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration defended the approved project, asserting that restarting the Las Flores Pipeline would provide much-needed American energy to a state with the highest gas prices in the nation.
Sable Offshore Corp. has not publicly commented on the lawsuit. The company is determined to resume production despite legal challenges and intends to operate within federal waters, where state regulations do not apply.
California is particularly sensitive to issues surrounding oil drilling due to the lasting impacts from the 2015 oil spill that released over 140,000 gallons of oil, devastating marine life and coastal habitats and triggering significant environmental concerns.
Critics of the federal approval, including environmental advocates and local lawmakers, emphasize the risks this initiative poses to coastal ecosystems and communities. As California seeks to transition towards cleaner energy options, the ongoing battle over fossil fuel production remains a contentious issue, reflective of broader environmental policy debates nationwide.
The project by Houston-based Sable Offshore Corp., which seeks to restart production in Santa Barbara waters affected by a 2015 oil spill, has been touted by the federal government as a critical step in increasing U.S. energy production. However, California officials, including Attorney General Rob Bonta, argue that the federal administration overstepped its bounds, infringing upon the state's regulatory authority.
“You can’t sidestep California’s environmental protections,” Bonta stated during a news conference announcing the lawsuit. “We’re drawing a line in the sand to protect our coast, our beaches, and our communities from the potential hazards posed by these pipelines.”
In contrast, a spokesman for the U.S. Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration defended the approved project, asserting that restarting the Las Flores Pipeline would provide much-needed American energy to a state with the highest gas prices in the nation.
Sable Offshore Corp. has not publicly commented on the lawsuit. The company is determined to resume production despite legal challenges and intends to operate within federal waters, where state regulations do not apply.
California is particularly sensitive to issues surrounding oil drilling due to the lasting impacts from the 2015 oil spill that released over 140,000 gallons of oil, devastating marine life and coastal habitats and triggering significant environmental concerns.
Critics of the federal approval, including environmental advocates and local lawmakers, emphasize the risks this initiative poses to coastal ecosystems and communities. As California seeks to transition towards cleaner energy options, the ongoing battle over fossil fuel production remains a contentious issue, reflective of broader environmental policy debates nationwide.
